tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10270506.post5240862951439739185..comments2024-01-30T03:40:00.558-08:00Comments on Adventist Media Response and Conversation: Creation 7th day follyRon Corsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02160607058464028162noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10270506.post-42891908121019216452023-09-30T14:35:58.043-07:002023-09-30T14:35:58.043-07:00Good reading your posttGood reading your posttFukumenhttps://tokyoghoulbook.tumblr.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10270506.post-81827729412877525572012-05-28T20:44:36.876-07:002012-05-28T20:44:36.876-07:00Sure; the link to the submitted paper was here:
...Sure; the link to the submitted paper was here: <br /><br />http://www.csda-adventistchurch.to/USTradeLawsuit/PDF/RRObjection.pdf<br /><br />Personally, I'm not comfortable just assuming that a court's ruling is automatically reasonable without looking into it, especially in religious matters.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10270506.post-72532102762989938202012-05-26T07:24:54.131-07:002012-05-26T07:24:54.131-07:00No I don't post on everything in the AToday di...No I don't post on everything in the AToday discussion, that would be rather silly. Yes when someone violates the court order I would expect the attorneys to recommend to the court that such normal contempt of court actions such as jail would be considered by the court. You do realize that reporters have gone to jail for not revealing sources when ordered to by the court. It is not because the person is violent it is a method of getting them to obey the laws and judicial authorities established in this country. As for you last part it shows me nothing, if you have what was submitted to the court I would be interested to see it. Though clearly the court rejected it so, I would expect most other reasonable people would also reject it. All kinds of stuff can be submitted that does not mean it is valid.Ron Corsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02160607058464028162noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10270506.post-51408767432116335972012-05-25T16:20:58.769-07:002012-05-25T16:20:58.769-07:00It seems like it would have been fair to include t...It seems like it would have been fair to include the posts where the arguments and conclusions made in this post were already addressed...<br /><br />For example, re: <b>"Thus the whole affair with jail no longer has anything to do with the SDA church but with violations of court orders,"</b> a Court document was posted showing the SDA's attorneys motioning and pressing the Court to not only find contempt, but to specifically imprison people for it. It further explained that the civil nature of the contempt (as opposed to criminal) made it a matter of the plaintiffs' discretion. <br /><br />Then, re: <b>"If one actually followed this kind of logic then anything regardless of legal finding would have to be accepted as part of religious liberty,"</b> a whole Objection to the court was posted that went addressed that exact issue in very great detail citing relevant laws.<br /><br />I didn't see anyone attempt to answer either of those posts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com